[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121023140753.GB14100@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 10:07:53 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
mukesh.rathor@...cle.com, Ian.Campbell@...rix.com,
stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] xen/pvh: Support ParaVirtualized Hardware extensions.
> +/*
> + * Unmaps the page appearing at a particular GPFN from the specified guest's
> + * pseudophysical address space.
> + * arg == addr of xen_remove_from_physmap_t.
> + */
> +#define XENMEM_remove_from_physmap 15
> +struct xen_remove_from_physmap {
> + /* Which domain to change the mapping for. */
> + domid_t domid;
> +
> + /* GPFN of the current mapping of the page. */
> + xen_pfn_t gpfn;
> +};
I just realized that this a bit of unfortunate. We end up
with on 64-bit with this layout:
{
0->1 [domid]
2->7 [nothing]
8->16 [gpfn]
}
which if one were to do a 32-bit build you would get:
{
0->1 [domid]
2->3 [nothing]
4->7 [gpfn]
}
which means another compat layer in Xen.
So I think it makes sense to modify this to be 32 and 64-bit
clean, something like this:
{
domid_t domid;
u8 pad[6];
xen_pfn_t gpfn;
/* xen_pfn_t under 32-bit x86 is 4 bytes, so extend it */
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
__u8 pad1[4];
#endif
}
that way the structure is exactly the same size and the offsets
align.
Mukesh, you OK with that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists