[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <112621141.CGPLIkkgz1@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:02:17 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: pdsw-power-team@....com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arvind.chauhan@....com, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: return early from __cpufreq_driver_getavg()
On Saturday 20 of October 2012 10:12:07 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Oct 20, 2012 3:37 AM, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday 20 of October 2012 01:42:05 Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > There is no need to do cpufreq_get_cpu() and cpufreq_put_cpu() for
> drivers that
> > > don't support getavg() routine.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> >
> > The patch doesn't seem to follow the changelog or the other way around.
>
> Sorry if my log isn't clear enough.
> But i could still see it matching the code :)
>
> I have moved the check for drivers capabilities at the top
> of routine, so that there is no need to call mentioned routines.
OK
Applied to linux-pm.git/linux-next as v3.8 material.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists