[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121025075752.GE3712@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:57:52 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Bin Gao <bin.gao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: arch/x86/Kconfig: not select X86_MPPARSE when SFI is present
* Bin Gao <bin.gao@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> MPS tables are not needed for systems that have proper ACPI support.
> This is also true for systems that have SFI in place.
>
> So this patch is to exclude X86_MPPARSE when either ACPI or SFI is present.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Gao <bin.gao@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 46c3bff..b1494bd 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ config X86_X2APIC
> If you don't know what to do here, say N.
>
> config X86_MPPARSE
> - bool "Enable MPS table" if ACPI
> + bool "Enable MPS table" if ACPI || SFI
> default y
> depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC
> ---help---
The changelog does not seem to match the patch. Did you want to
say:
" So this patch allows the configuration (turning off) of
CONFIG_X86_MPPARSE when either ACPI or SFI is present. "
?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists