linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 000/193] remove CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <59643.1351128330@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:25:30 -0400
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 000/193] remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:01:13 -0700, Kees Cook said:
> This config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is
> almost always enabled by default (especially in distro builds). As agreed
> during the Linux kernel summit, it should be removed.
>
> As such, this is the patch series for removing CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL,
> with the hopes of all the various maintainers pulling these changes into
> their trees.  I'm carrying the first patch (that makes CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
> "default y") in my linux-next tree, so builds there will see the impact
> immediately.

Has anybody tested what happens if you're doing a git bisect that ends up crossing
back and forth across the commit for this?  I've been burned before when stuff
evaporates out of my .config during a bisect when an option grows/loses a 'depends
on' clause.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped