[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLkGcccbA-NOFpTayzeHCy_cOHfbABYf4CJWrL5AxmNTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 23:29:10 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 000/193] remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 6:25 PM, <Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 13:01:13 -0700, Kees Cook said:
>> This config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is
>> almost always enabled by default (especially in distro builds). As agreed
>> during the Linux kernel summit, it should be removed.
>>
>> As such, this is the patch series for removing CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL,
>> with the hopes of all the various maintainers pulling these changes into
>> their trees. I'm carrying the first patch (that makes CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL
>> "default y") in my linux-next tree, so builds there will see the impact
>> immediately.
>
> Has anybody tested what happens if you're doing a git bisect that ends up crossing
> back and forth across the commit for this? I've been burned before when stuff
> evaporates out of my .config during a bisect when an option grows/loses a 'depends
> on' clause.
I haven't tried a bisect, but I've been bouncing around between trees
and haven't had any surprises yet.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists