lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121026042832.GB20205@linux-sh.org>
Date:	Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:28:33 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 027/193] arch/sh: remove CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 01:01:40PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> This config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is
> almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the Linux kernel
> summit, remove it.
> 
> CC: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
> CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>

While there are cases where it is largely superfluous, we also have
plenty of cases in here that are genuinely experimental features and
generally shouldn't be enabled unless someone is prepared for some
hacking. We can of course replace this with an arch-specific option if
needed, but I disagree with suddenly making experimental features
suddenly appear to be anything other than what they are.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ