[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121025180652.GM11442@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:06:52 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, devel@...nvz.org,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/18] memcg: infrastructure to match an allocation to
the right cache
Hello, Glauber.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 03:05:22PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> > Is there any rmb() pair?
> > As far as I know, without rmb(), wmb() doesn't guarantee anything.
> >
>
> There should be. But it seems I missed it. Speaking of which, I should
You probably can use read_barrier_depends().
> wmb() after the NULL assignment in release cache as well.
And you probably don't need that. dangling pointer is protected by
RCU and there isn't any memory accesses which can paired with that
anyway.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists