[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121025180801.GA22642@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:08:01 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, alan@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jirislaby@...il.com,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/21] TTY: move tty buffers to tty_port
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 02:02:00PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> On 10/18/2012 04:26 PM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> > So this is it. The big step why we did all the work over the past
> > kernel releases. Now everything is prepared, so nothing protects us
> > from doing that big step.
> >
> > | | \ \ nnnn/^l | |
> > | | \ / / | |
> > | '-,.__ => \/ ,-` => | '-,.__
> > | O __.´´) ( .` | O __.´´)
> > ~~~ ~~ `` ~~~ ~~
> > The buffers are now in the tty_port structure and we can start
> > teaching the buffer helpers (insert char/string, flip etc.) to use
> > tty_port instead of tty_struct all around.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
> > ---
>
> Fuzzing with trinity inside a KVM tools (lkvm) guest with -next kernel
> uncovered the following warning:
>
> [ 1339.448706] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 1339.451224] WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:476 flush_to_ldisc+0x60/0x200()
> [ 1339.454272] tty is NULLPid: 7147, comm: kworker/4:0 Tainted: G W 3.7.0-rc2-next-20121025-sasha-00001-g673f98e-dirty #75
> [ 1339.458693] Call Trace:
> [ 1339.459410] [<ffffffff81bb1ea0>] ? flush_to_ldisc+0x60/0x200
> [ 1339.461289] [<ffffffff81109b86>] warn_slowpath_common+0x86/0xb0
> [ 1339.462992] [<ffffffff81109c11>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x41/0x50
> [ 1339.464772] [<ffffffff81bb1ea0>] flush_to_ldisc+0x60/0x200
> [ 1339.467076] [<ffffffff8112d5a9>] process_one_work+0x3b9/0x770
> [ 1339.469501] [<ffffffff8112d458>] ? process_one_work+0x268/0x770
> [ 1339.472053] [<ffffffff8112dcc1>] ? worker_thread+0x51/0x3f0
> [ 1339.473831] [<ffffffff81bb1e40>] ? __tty_buffer_request_room+0x180/0x180
> [ 1339.475834] [<ffffffff8112df2a>] worker_thread+0x2ba/0x3f0
> [ 1339.478027] [<ffffffff8112dc70>] ? rescuer_thread+0x2d0/0x2d0
> [ 1339.480431] [<ffffffff81138c33>] kthread+0xe3/0xf0
> [ 1339.482383] [<ffffffff8117d7be>] ? put_lock_stats.isra.16+0xe/0x40
> [ 1339.484171] [<ffffffff81138b50>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x90/0x90
> [ 1339.485886] [<ffffffff83aedebc>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
> [ 1339.487943] [<ffffffff81138b50>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x90/0x90
> [ 1339.490435] ---[ end trace e01a8b0af77894c4 ]---
>
> I'm guessing it happens because we never cancel the scheduled work when we
> free the buffer, so the scheduled work may run even after we freed the buffer.
>
> Besides the warning itself, I think that 'tty is NULL' would need a newline
> after it. Greg, should I send a patch for that?
Yes, please do.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists