[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1351241315.7077.16.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 14:18:35 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...radead.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: vinod.koul@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
spear-devel@...t.st.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support
On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 14:25 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Hi Vinod,
>
> On 16 October 2012 09:49, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > dw_dmac driver already supports device tree but it used to have its platform
> > data passed the non-DT way.
> >
> > This patch does following changes:
> > - pass platform data via DT, non-DT way still takes precedence if both are used.
> > - create generic filter routine
> > - Earlier slave information was made available by slave specific filter routines
> > in chan->private field. Now, this information would be passed from within dmac
> > DT node. Slave drivers would now be required to pass bus_id (a string) as
> > parameter to this generic filter(), which would be compared against the slave
> > data passed from DT, by the generic filter routine.
> > - Update binding document
>
> I can see that you applied these patches and they are present in
> linux-next. But i feel
> the order of patches is bad.
Yes looks like I forgot to sort the mbox series :(
since all patches were applied nicely, and they seem fairly independent
of each other it should cause issue. Let me know if you wnat me to redo
my -next.
--
Vinod Koul
Intel Corp.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists