[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508D8629.4040208@att.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 14:23:21 -0500
From: Daniel Santos <danielfsantos@....net>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>,
Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Pavel Pisa <pisa@....felk.cvut.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] bug.h: directly include linux/compiler.h
On 10/24/2012 02:55 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:33:55AM -0500, danielfsantos@....net wrote:
>> Currently, we are only including asm/bug.h and then expecting that
>> linux/compiler.h will eventually be included to define __linktime_error
>> (used in BUILD_BUG_ON). This patch includes it directly for clarity and
>> to avoid the possibility of changes in <arch>/*/include/asm/bug.h being
>> changed or not including linux/compiler.h for some reason. (Later
>> patches will in this set use more macros defined in compiler*.h.)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Santos <daniel.santos@...ox.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/bug.h | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/bug.h b/include/linux/bug.h
>> index aaac4bb..4bd74d8 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/bug.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/bug.h
>> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>> #define _LINUX_BUG_H
>>
>> #include <asm/bug.h>
>> +#include <linux/compiler.h>
>>
>> enum bug_trap_type {
>> BUG_TRAP_TYPE_NONE = 0,
>> --
>> 1.7.3.4
> Why is this a separate patch and why not add that single line in 6/10
> where you define BUILD_BUG_ON?
>
> Thanks.
Sorry about that. I think this was originally in another patch with
something else that I moved to another patch set and it ended up by its
self. I'll squash it and resubmit.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists