lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 07:27:21 +0100 From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com> CC: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: add missing header include On 10/29/2012 02:16 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: > On Monday, October 29, 2012 6:49 AM Marek Vasut wrote >> >> On 10/26/2012 06:30 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: >>> This patch adds missing device.h header to fix build warnings as below: >>> >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: 'struct device' declared inside parameter list [enabled by >> default] >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is >> probably not what you want >>> [enabled by default] >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:27:45: warning: 'struct device' declared inside parameter list [enabled by >> default] >>> In file included from drivers/cpuidle/driver.c:15:0: >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: 'struct device' declared inside parameter list [enabled by >> default] >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is >> probably not what you want >>> [enabled by default] >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:27:45: warning: 'struct device' declared inside parameter list [enabled by >> default] >>> >>> This build warning is introduced by commit efeca1b >>> "cpuidle / sysfs: change function parameter". >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com> >>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> >>> --- >> >> Jingoo, could you copy-pastebin your config file. I don't have this >> warning and I would like to understand why. > > Hi Daniel Lezcano, > > Could you build the code by using GCC 4.6.x? > In my opinion, it would be better. That was the case. => gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3) 4.6.1 > Also, my config option is as below: > make exynos4_defconfig + CONFIG_CPU_IDLE Ok, I got the warning with this arch. Let's see why this is not happening with x86 ... Thanks -- Daniel > Best regards, > Jingoo Han > > >> >> Thanks >> -- Daniel >> >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h | 2 ++ >>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h >>> index a5bbd1c..2120d9e 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h >>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h >>> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ >>> #ifndef __DRIVER_CPUIDLE_H >>> #define __DRIVER_CPUIDLE_H >>> >>> +#include <linux/device.h> >>> + >>> /* For internal use only */ >>> extern struct cpuidle_governor *cpuidle_curr_governor; >>> extern struct list_head cpuidle_governors; >> >> >> -- >> <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs >> >> Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | >> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | >> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog > -- <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook | <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter | <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists