[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d5c617feaaecfcf9e358a8b2cc35d20@hardeman.nu>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:09:13 +0100
From: David Härdeman <david@...deman.nu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bruno Prémont <bonbons@...ux-vserver.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the v4l-dvb tree
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:14:03 +1100, Stephen Rothwell
<sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> After merging the v4l-dvb tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/hid/hid-picolcd_cir.c: In function 'picolcd_init_cir':
> drivers/hid/hid-picolcd_cir.c:119:27: error: 'RC_TYPE_ALL' undeclared
> (first use in this function)
I can fix it, should be easy (rename RC_TYPE_ALL to RC_BIT_ALL).
> Caused by commit c003ab1bedf0 ("[media] rc-core: add separate defines
for
> protocol bitmaps and numbers"). The new reference was introduced in
> commit ae08e324146c ("HID: picoLCD: Add support for CIR") which was
> merged by Linus on October 2 into v3.7-rc1 via the hid tree.
>
> I have used the v4l-dvb tree from next-20121026 for today.
The question is in which form you want the patch - as a separate patch or
a new version of commit c003ab1bedf0 (i.e. the entire patch)? Also, against
which tree should I create the patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists