[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508E65EA.2080402@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 16:48:02 +0530
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: <balbi@...com>
CC: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
<arc-linux-dev@...opsys.com>, <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] serial/arc-uart: Add new driver
I've already posted a v7 of the driver - with all your comments.
If you think it's ok - can you ACK it please !
TIA,
-Vineet
On Monday 29 October 2012 04:36 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:24:46PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On Friday 26 October 2012 05:40 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 05:33:16PM +0530, Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com wrote:
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Release the memory region(s) being used by 'port'.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static void arc_serial_release_port(struct uart_port *port)
>>>> +{
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Request the memory region(s) being used by 'port'.
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int arc_serial_request_port(struct uart_port *port)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Verify the new serial_struct (for TIOCSSERIAL).
>>>> + */
>>>> +static int
>>>> +arc_serial_verify_port(struct uart_port *port, struct serial_struct *ser)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> +}
>>> why all these empty functions with wrong comments above them ??
>> Actually serial_core.c invokes the reqest/release callbacks w/o
>> verifying for a NULL pointer check. Thus they need to be in there even
>> if empty. I've removed the offending comments though !
> fair enough ;-)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists