[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121029110650.GA29410@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 13:06:50 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
CC: <balbi@...com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<alan@...ux.intel.com>, <arc-linux-dev@...opsys.com>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] serial/arc-uart: Add new driver
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:24:46PM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Friday 26 October 2012 05:40 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 05:33:16PM +0530, Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com wrote:
> >> +/*
> >> + * Release the memory region(s) being used by 'port'.
> >> + */
> >> +static void arc_serial_release_port(struct uart_port *port)
> >> +{
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Request the memory region(s) being used by 'port'.
> >> + */
> >> +static int arc_serial_request_port(struct uart_port *port)
> >> +{
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Verify the new serial_struct (for TIOCSSERIAL).
> >> + */
> >> +static int
> >> +arc_serial_verify_port(struct uart_port *port, struct serial_struct *ser)
> >> +{
> >> + return 0;
> >> +}
> > why all these empty functions with wrong comments above them ??
>
> Actually serial_core.c invokes the reqest/release callbacks w/o
> verifying for a NULL pointer check. Thus they need to be in there even
> if empty. I've removed the offending comments though !
fair enough ;-)
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists