linux-kernel - Re: [RFC 5/6] sched: pack the idle load balance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfTPtBsAJ4u265TzOz9qvL4d-eMmrVD-MtgG_Rri_2shGrPBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:27:54 +0100
From:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	mingo@...hat.com, pjt@...gle.com, linux@....linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC 5/6] sched: pack the idle load balance

On 24 October 2012 17:21, Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com> wrote:
> On Sunday 07 October 2012 01:13 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>>
>> Look for an idle CPU close the pack buddy CPU whenever possible.
>
> s/close/close to

yes

>
>> The goal is to prevent the wake up of a CPU which doesn't share the power
>> line of the pack CPU
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
>> ---
>>   kernel/sched/fair.c |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index 6df53b5..f76acdc 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -5158,7 +5158,25 @@ static struct {
>>
>>   static inline int find_new_ilb(int call_cpu)
>>   {
>> +       struct sched_domain *sd;
>>         int ilb = cpumask_first(nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
>> +       int buddy = per_cpu(sd_pack_buddy, call_cpu);
>> +
>> +       /*
>> +        * If we have a pack buddy CPU, we try to run load balance on a
>> CPU
>> +        * that is close to the buddy.
>> +        */
>> +       if (buddy != -1)
>> +               for_each_domain(buddy, sd) {
>> +                       if (sd->flags & SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER)
>> +                               continue;
>
> Do you mean SD_SHARE_POWERLINE here ?

No, I just don't want to take hyperthread level for ILB

>
>> +
>> +                       ilb = cpumask_first_and(sched_domain_span(sd),
>> +                                       nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
>> +
>> +                       if (ilb < nr_cpu_ids)
>> +                               break;
>> +               }
>>
>>         if (ilb < nr_cpu_ids && idle_cpu(ilb))
>>                 return ilb;
>>
> Can you please expand "idle CPU _close_ the pack buddy CPU" ?

The goal is to packed  the tasks on the pack buddy CPU so when the
scheduler needs to start ILB, I try to wake up a CPU that is close to
the buddy and preferably in the same cluster

>
> Regards
> santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/