[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121029132552.GB16391@Krystal>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:25:52 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
davem@...emloft.net, rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...e.hu,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, aarcange@...hat.com, ericvh@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, axboe@...nel.dk, agk@...hat.com,
dm-devel@...hat.com, neilb@...e.de, ccaulfie@...hat.com,
teigland@...hat.com, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
bfields@...ldses.org, fweisbec@...il.com, jesse@...ira.com,
venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com, ejt@...hat.com,
snitzer@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
dev@...nvswitch.org, rds-devel@....oracle.com, lw@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 14/16] net,rds: use new hashtable implementation
* Sasha Levin (levinsasha928@...il.com) wrote:
> Switch rds to use the new hashtable implementation. This reduces the amount of
> generic unrelated code in rds.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
> ---
> net/rds/bind.c | 28 +++++++++-----
> net/rds/connection.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/rds/bind.c b/net/rds/bind.c
> index 637bde5..79d65ce 100644
> --- a/net/rds/bind.c
> +++ b/net/rds/bind.c
> @@ -36,16 +36,16 @@
> #include <linux/if_arp.h>
> #include <linux/jhash.h>
> #include <linux/ratelimit.h>
> +#include <linux/hashtable.h>
> #include "rds.h"
>
> -#define BIND_HASH_SIZE 1024
> -static struct hlist_head bind_hash_table[BIND_HASH_SIZE];
> +#define BIND_HASH_BITS 10
> +static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(bind_hash_table, BIND_HASH_BITS);
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(rds_bind_lock);
>
> -static struct hlist_head *hash_to_bucket(__be32 addr, __be16 port)
> +static u32 rds_hash(__be32 addr, __be16 port)
> {
> - return bind_hash_table + (jhash_2words((u32)addr, (u32)port, 0) &
> - (BIND_HASH_SIZE - 1));
> + return jhash_2words((u32)addr, (u32)port, 0);
> }
>
> static struct rds_sock *rds_bind_lookup(__be32 addr, __be16 port,
> @@ -53,12 +53,12 @@ static struct rds_sock *rds_bind_lookup(__be32 addr, __be16 port,
> {
> struct rds_sock *rs;
> struct hlist_node *node;
> - struct hlist_head *head = hash_to_bucket(addr, port);
> + u32 key = rds_hash(addr, port);
> u64 cmp;
> u64 needle = ((u64)be32_to_cpu(addr) << 32) | be16_to_cpu(port);
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(rs, node, head, rs_bound_node) {
> + hash_for_each_possible_rcu(bind_hash_table, rs, node, rs_bound_node, key) {
here too, key will be hashed twice:
- once by jhash_2words,
- once by hash_32(),
is this intended ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists