[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121029132931.GC16391@Krystal>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:29:31 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
davem@...emloft.net, rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...e.hu,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, aarcange@...hat.com, ericvh@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, josh@...htriplett.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, axboe@...nel.dk, agk@...hat.com,
dm-devel@...hat.com, neilb@...e.de, ccaulfie@...hat.com,
teigland@...hat.com, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
bfields@...ldses.org, fweisbec@...il.com, jesse@...ira.com,
venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com, ejt@...hat.com,
snitzer@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
dev@...nvswitch.org, rds-devel@....oracle.com, lw@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 15/16] openvswitch: use new hashtable implementation
* Sasha Levin (levinsasha928@...il.com) wrote:
[...]
> -static struct hlist_head *hash_bucket(struct net *net, const char *name)
> -{
> - unsigned int hash = jhash(name, strlen(name), (unsigned long) net);
> - return &dev_table[hash & (VPORT_HASH_BUCKETS - 1)];
> -}
> -
> /**
> * ovs_vport_locate - find a port that has already been created
> *
> @@ -84,13 +76,12 @@ static struct hlist_head *hash_bucket(struct net *net, const char *name)
> */
> struct vport *ovs_vport_locate(struct net *net, const char *name)
> {
> - struct hlist_head *bucket = hash_bucket(net, name);
> struct vport *vport;
> struct hlist_node *node;
> + int key = full_name_hash(name, strlen(name));
>
> - hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(vport, node, bucket, hash_node)
> - if (!strcmp(name, vport->ops->get_name(vport)) &&
> - net_eq(ovs_dp_get_net(vport->dp), net))
> + hash_for_each_possible_rcu(dev_table, vport, node, hash_node, key)
Is applying hash_32() on top of full_name_hash() needed and expected ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
> + if (!strcmp(name, vport->ops->get_name(vport)))
> return vport;
>
> return NULL;
> @@ -174,7 +165,8 @@ struct vport *ovs_vport_add(const struct vport_parms *parms)
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vport_ops_list); i++) {
> if (vport_ops_list[i]->type == parms->type) {
> - struct hlist_head *bucket;
> + int key;
> + const char *name;
>
> vport = vport_ops_list[i]->create(parms);
> if (IS_ERR(vport)) {
> @@ -182,9 +174,9 @@ struct vport *ovs_vport_add(const struct vport_parms *parms)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - bucket = hash_bucket(ovs_dp_get_net(vport->dp),
> - vport->ops->get_name(vport));
> - hlist_add_head_rcu(&vport->hash_node, bucket);
> + name = vport->ops->get_name(vport);
> + key = full_name_hash(name, strlen(name));
> + hash_add_rcu(dev_table, &vport->hash_node, key);
> return vport;
> }
> }
> @@ -225,7 +217,7 @@ void ovs_vport_del(struct vport *vport)
> {
> ASSERT_RTNL();
>
> - hlist_del_rcu(&vport->hash_node);
> + hash_del_rcu(&vport->hash_node);
>
> vport->ops->destroy(vport);
> }
> --
> 1.7.12.4
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists