[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <508E9F5B.5010402@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:23:07 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/mm: only do a local TLB flush in ptep_set_access_flags()
On 10/26/2012 03:18 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>> I can change the text of the changelog, however it looks
>> like do_wp_page does actually use ptep_set_access_flags
>> to set the write bit in the pte...
>>
>> I guess both need to be reflected in the changelog text
>> somehow?
>
> Yeah, and by now, after all this discussion, I suspect it should be
> committed with a comment too. Commit messages are good and all, but
> unless chasing a particular bug they introduced, we shouldn't expect
> people to read them for background information.
Now that we have the TLB things taken care of, and
comments to patches 10/31 and 26/31 have been addressed,
is there anything else that needs to be done before
these NUMA patches can be merged?
Anyone, this is a good time to speak up. We have some
time to address whatever concern you may have.
(besides waiting for the next merge window)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists