[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121030160149.GA14234@feng-snb>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 00:01:49 +0800
From: Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/8] perf hists browser: Add option for runtime
switching perf data file
Hi Arnaldo,
Thanks for the review.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:06:20PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:56:08AM +0800, Feng Tang escreveu:
> > + pwd_dir = opendir(pwd);
> > + if (!pwd_dir)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + memset(options, 0, sizeof(options));
> > + memset(options, 0, sizeof(abs_path));
> > +
> > + while ((dent = readdir(pwd_dir))) {
> > + char path[PATH_MAX];
> > + u64 magic;
> > + char *name = dent->d_name;
> > + FILE *file;
> > +
> > + if (!(dent->d_type == DT_REG))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + snprintf(path, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s", pwd, name);
> > +
> > + file = fopen(path, "r");
> > + if (!file)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (fread(&magic, 1, 8, file) < 8)
> > + goto close_file_and_continue;
> > +
> > + if (is_perf_magic(magic)) {
> > + options[nr_options] = strdup(name);
> > + if (!options[nr_options])
> > + goto close_file_and_continue;
>
> Silently not offering a valid file? At this point I think you should
> warn the user and bail out.
Yeah, we should give a warning message and go on with the valid data
files already got.
> > +
> > + abs_path[nr_options] = strdup(path);
> > + if (!abs_path[nr_options]) {
> > + free(options[nr_options]);
> > + goto close_file_and_continue;
> > + }
> > +
> > + nr_options++;
> > + }
> > +
> > +close_file_and_continue:
> > + fclose(file);
> > + if (nr_options >= 256)
> > + break;
>
> Why is this? At the very least a warning has to be given to the user
> that way too many perf.data files are present, so only the first N are
> in the menu.
Ok.
> > + }
> > + closedir(pwd_dir);
> > +
> > + if (nr_options) {
> > + choice = ui__popup_menu(nr_options, options);
> > + if (choice < nr_options && choice >= 0) {
> > + tmp = strdup(abs_path[choice]);
> > + if (tmp) {
> > + if (is_input_name_malloced)
> > + free((void *)input_name);
> > + input_name = tmp;
> > + is_input_name_malloced = true;
> > + ret = 0;
> > + }
>
> Here you return an error, but will the user get any warning on the
> caller of this function if it returns -1?
>
>
> > + /* Switch to another data file */
> > + else if (choice == switch_data) {
> > +do_data_switch:
> > + if (!switch_data_file()) {
> > + key = K_SWITCH_INPUT_DATA;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> ... no, so it will silently continue and the user will get confused.
>
Yes, I will add more ui_warning() in these error/problematic path
Thanks,
Feng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists