[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50902BFC.4090309@converseincode.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:35:24 -0400
From: Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: balbi@...com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Helper macros used for replacing the use of VLAIS
On 12-10-30 03:20 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 02:25:19PM -0400, Behan Webster wrote:
>> The use of variable length arrays in structs (VLAIS) in the Linux Kernel code
>> precludes the use of compilers which don't implement VLAIS (for instance the
>> Clang compiler). This new header file contains macros which can be used to
>> calculate the size and offset of variables in an allocated buffer of memory
>> taking into account alignment issues.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/valign.h | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 include/linux/valign.h
> You sent the same patch here, to two different trees (usb and
> networking). That's not good, what happens if they both apply them?
Good point. My mistake.
People in both subsystems needed to see the patch which is why I sent them.
What would have been a better approach? And how can I fix this?
Behan
--
Behan Webster
behanw@...verseincode.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists