linux-kernel - [PART6 Patch] mempolicy: fix is_valid

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1351675458-11859-2-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:24:18 +0800
From:	Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: [PART6 Patch] mempolicy: fix is_valid_nodemask()

From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>

is_valid_nodemask() is introduced by 19770b32. but it does not match
its comments, because it does not check the zone which > policy_zone.

Also in b377fd, this commits told us, if highest zone is ZONE_MOVABLE,
we should also apply memory policies to it. so ZONE_MOVABLE should be valid zone
for policies. is_valid_nodemask() need to be changed to match it.

Fix: check all zones, even its zoneid > policy_zone.
Use nodes_intersects() instead open code to check it.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
---
 mm/mempolicy.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index d04a8a5..de5aa24 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -140,19 +140,7 @@ static const struct mempolicy_operations {
 /* Check that the nodemask contains at least one populated zone */
 static int is_valid_nodemask(const nodemask_t *nodemask)
 {
-	int nd, k;
-
-	for_each_node_mask(nd, *nodemask) {
-		struct zone *z;
-
-		for (k = 0; k <= policy_zone; k++) {
-			z = &NODE_DATA(nd)->node_zones[k];
-			if (z->present_pages > 0)
-				return 1;
-		}
-	}
-
-	return 0;
+	return nodes_intersects(*nodemask, node_states[N_MEMORY]);
 }
 
 static inline int mpol_store_user_nodemask(const struct mempolicy *pol)
@@ -1572,6 +1560,26 @@ struct mempolicy *get_vma_policy(struct task_struct *task,
 	return pol;
 }
 
+static int apply_policy_zone(struct mempolicy *policy, enum zone_type zone)
+{
+	enum zone_type dynamic_policy_zone = policy_zone;
+
+	BUG_ON(dynamic_policy_zone == ZONE_MOVABLE);
+
+	/*
+	 * if policy->v.nodes has movable memory only,
+	 * we apply policy when gfp_zone(gfp) = ZONE_MOVABLE only.
+	 *
+	 * policy->v.nodes is intersect with node_states[N_MEMORY].
+	 * so if the following test faile, it implies
+	 * policy->v.nodes has movable memory only.
+	 */
+	if (!nodes_intersects(policy->v.nodes, node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY]))
+		dynamic_policy_zone = ZONE_MOVABLE;
+
+	return zone >= dynamic_policy_zone;
+}
+
 /*
  * Return a nodemask representing a mempolicy for filtering nodes for
  * page allocation
@@ -1580,7 +1588,7 @@ static nodemask_t *policy_nodemask(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy)
 {
 	/* Lower zones don't get a nodemask applied for MPOL_BIND */
 	if (unlikely(policy->mode == MPOL_BIND) &&
-			gfp_zone(gfp) >= policy_zone &&
+			apply_policy_zone(policy, gfp_zone(gfp)) &&
 			cpuset_nodemask_valid_mems_allowed(&policy->v.nodes))
 		return &policy->v.nodes;
 
-- 
1.8.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/