[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121031010642.GN15767@bbox>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 10:06:42 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
gaowanlong@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] zram/zsmalloc promotion
Thanks all,
At last, everybody who contributes to zsmalloc want to put it under /lib.
Greg,
What should I do for promoting this dragging patchset?
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:56:46PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> This patchset promotes zram/zsmalloc from staging.
> Both are very clean and zram have been used by many embedded product
> for a long time.
> It's time to go out of staging.
>
> Greg, Jens is already OK that zram is located under driver/blocks/.
> The issue remained is where we put zsmalloc.
> The candidate is two under mm/ or under lib/
> Konrad and Nitin wanted to put zsmalloc into lib/ instead of mm/.
>
> Quote from Nitin
> "
> I think mm/ directory should only contain the code which is intended
> for global use such as the slab allocator, page reclaim code etc.
> zsmalloc is used by only one (or possibly two) drivers, so lib/ seems
> to be the right place.
> "
>
> Quote from Konrand
> "
> I like the idea of keeping it in /lib or /mm. Actually 'lib' sounds more
> appropriate since it is dealing with storing a bunch of pages in a nice
> layout for great density purposes.
> "
>
> In fact, there is some history about that.
>
> Why I put zsmalloc into under mm firstly was that Andrew had a concern
> about using strut page's some fields freely in zsmalloc so he wanted
> to maintain it in mm/ if I remember correctly.
>
> So I and Nitin tried to ask the opinion to akpm several times
> (at least 6 and even I sent such patch a few month ago) but didn't get
> any reply from him so I guess he doesn't have any concern about that
> any more.
>
> In point of view that it's an another slab-like allocator,
> it might be proper under mm but it's not popular as current mm's
> allocators(/SLUB/SLOB and page allocator).
>
> Frankly speaking, I don't care whether we put it to mm/ or lib/.
> It seems contributors(ex, Nitin and Konrad) like lib/ and Andrew is still
> silent. That's why I am biased into lib/ now.
>
> If someone yell we should keep it to mm/ by logical claim, I can change
> my mind easily. Please raise your hand.
>
> If Andrew doesn't have a concern about that any more, I would like to
> locate it into /lib.
>
> This patchset is based on next-20121029
>
> Minchan Kim (3):
> zsmalloc: promote to lib/
> zram: promote zram from staging
> zram: select ZSMALLOC when ZRAM is configured
>
> drivers/block/Kconfig | 1 +
> drivers/block/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/block/zram/Kconfig | 26 +
> drivers/block/zram/Makefile | 3 +
> drivers/block/zram/zram.txt | 76 +++
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 793 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h | 119 ++++
> drivers/block/zram/zram_sysfs.c | 225 +++++++
> drivers/staging/Kconfig | 4 -
> drivers/staging/Makefile | 1 -
> drivers/staging/zcache/zcache-main.c | 4 +-
> drivers/staging/zram/Kconfig | 25 -
> drivers/staging/zram/Makefile | 3 -
> drivers/staging/zram/zram.txt | 76 ---
> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 793 ----------------------
> drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.h | 120 ----
> drivers/staging/zram/zram_sysfs.c | 225 -------
> drivers/staging/zsmalloc/Kconfig | 10 -
> drivers/staging/zsmalloc/Makefile | 3 -
> drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c | 1064 ------------------------------
> drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc.h | 43 --
> include/linux/zsmalloc.h | 43 ++
> lib/Kconfig | 18 +
> lib/Makefile | 1 +
> lib/zsmalloc.c | 1064 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 25 files changed, 2372 insertions(+), 2369 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/block/zram/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/block/zram/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/block/zram/zram.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h
> create mode 100644 drivers/block/zram/zram_sysfs.c
> delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/zram/Kconfig
> delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/zram/Makefile
> delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/zram/zram.txt
> delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
> delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.h
> delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/zram/zram_sysfs.c
> delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/zsmalloc/Kconfig
> delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/zsmalloc/Makefile
> delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc-main.c
> delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/zsmalloc/zsmalloc.h
> create mode 100644 include/linux/zsmalloc.h
> create mode 100644 lib/zsmalloc.c
>
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists