lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:49:19 +0000 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:37:50 +0000 Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:39:19PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:17:43 +0000 > > Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote: > > > By booting a signed kernel, not turning on swap and writing directly to > > > the swap partition. > > > > Ok so the actual problem is that you are signing kernels that allow the > > user to skip the S4 resume check ? > > What S4 resume check? One you would add .. but no I'm wrong there - its a problem at the suspend point so you do need a signature for it. Oh well yet another reason it's nto useful. Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists