[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121031174422.GA19043@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:44:22 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 05:44:40PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > That does still leave me a little uneasy as far as the microcode
> > licenses go. I don't know that we can distribute signed copies of some
> > of them, and we obviously can't sign at the user end.
>
> You seem to put them in signed rpm packages ?
That's not a modification of the files that say "You have permission to
distribute unmodified versions of this file". If a lawyer says this is
fine, I'm happy.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists