[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAN8Q1EcVfzJJh+XMeXMMk33kwyyyRoEWsuEbSQqVW0Vz3i3Vuw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:25:02 -0700
From: Peter LaDow <petela@...ougs.wsu.edu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 3/4] net: netfilter: Serialize xt_write_recseq sections
on RT
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
> The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
> local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
> that and needs explicit serialization here.
>
> Reported-by: Peter LaDow <petela@...ougs.wsu.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> diff --git a/include/linux/locallock.h b/include/linux/locallock.h
> index f1804a3..a5eea5d 100644
> diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h b/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h
> index 32cddf7..bed90da2 100644
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
> index 899b71c..5db16ea 100644
I'm trying these out right now. We've applied these patches to
3.0.36-rt58 (rather than pull in the full 3.0.48-rt72 -- too much risk
for us right now to do a full kernel change). I am setting up a
3.0.48-rt72-rc1 fixture as well to test the release candidate.
Thanks,
Pete
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists