linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT 3/4] net: netfilter: Serialize xt_write

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1211012213460.2756@ionos>
Date:	Thu, 1 Nov 2012 22:26:30 +0100 (CET)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Peter LaDow <petela@...ougs.wsu.edu>
cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>, John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 3/4] net: netfilter: Serialize xt_write_recseq sections
 on RT

On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Peter LaDow wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> >
> > The netfilter code relies only on the implicit semantics of
> > local_bh_disable() for serializing wt_write_recseq sections. RT breaks
> > that and needs explicit serialization here.
> >
> > Reported-by: Peter LaDow <petela@...ougs.wsu.edu>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/locallock.h b/include/linux/locallock.h
> > index f1804a3..a5eea5d 100644
> 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h b/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h
> > index 32cddf7..bed90da2 100644
> 
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/core.c b/net/netfilter/core.c
> > index 899b71c..5db16ea 100644
> 
> I'm trying these out right now.  We've applied these patches to
> 3.0.36-rt58 (rather than pull in the full 3.0.48-rt72 -- too much risk
> for us right now to do a full kernel change).  I am setting up a

Cough. You are missing a boat load of crucial fixes. There is a damned
good reason why 3.0.stable got 12 updates and the -rt version 14.

Your risk assessment is definitley interesting.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/