[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50924FCD.2020100@hitachi.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:32:45 +0900
From: Mitsuhiro Tanino <mitsuhiro.tanino.gm@...achi.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/2] Exclude hwpoison page from vmcore dump
Hi Vivek,
(2012/10/31 23:14), Vivek Goyal wrote:
> If hwpoision functionality is not available in hardware, then respective
> bit will not be even set in struct page and it will be saved by default.
> So it should not matter whether hardware has hwpoision functionality
> or not.
Thanks, I understand.
> I think that removing hwpoisno pages by default makes sense. If somebody
> does have a reasonable case of not doing so, then we could either
> introduce anther filtering level (based on type) or add another command
> line option like (--no-hwposion-filtering) etc.
I agree with you.
If somebody requests to support for disabling the filter of hwpoison pages,
this option will be discussed.
Regards,
Mitshuhiro Tanino (mitsuhiro.tanino.gm@...achi.com)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists