| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <5092E058020000780008EBA2@nat28.tlf.novell.com> Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:49:28 +0000 From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...e.com> To: <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <stern@...land.harvard.edu> Cc: <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, <rdunlap@...radead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 31 (ehci, dbgp) >>> Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> 11/01/12 9:39 PM >>> >On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> 11/01/12 4:28 PM >>> >> >Evidently we need to change your new test in >> >drivers/usb/early/ehci-dbgp.c to: >> > >> >#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_HCD_EHCI) || defined(CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA_HOST) >> > >> >Upcoming changes to ehci-hcd will make this unnecessary in 3.8, but for >> >now we need it. >> >> Which tells me that the CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT version would have been >> the better one (and I would favor that over the ugly variant you suggest >> above). > >I also suggested IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB), which is no uglier than what >you submitted and would also fix this build error. How about using it >instead? Yes, that's better. Question then is - updated original patch or incremental one? Jan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists