[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1211021001060.1356-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 10:01:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
<rdunlap@...radead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Oct 31 (ehci, dbgp)
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> 11/01/12 9:39 PM >>>
> >On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> 11/01/12 4:28 PM >>>
> >> >Evidently we need to change your new test in
> >> >drivers/usb/early/ehci-dbgp.c to:
> >> >
> >> >#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB_HCD_EHCI) || defined(CONFIG_USB_CHIPIDEA_HOST)
> >> >
> >> >Upcoming changes to ehci-hcd will make this unnecessary in 3.8, but for
> >> >now we need it.
> >>
> >> Which tells me that the CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT version would have been
> >> the better one (and I would favor that over the ugly variant you suggest
> >> above).
> >
> >I also suggested IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_USB), which is no uglier than what
> >you submitted and would also fix this build error. How about using it
> >instead?
>
> Yes, that's better. Question then is - updated original patch or incremental one?
Greg will probably want an incremental patch, because the original has
already been merged.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists