[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5094097302000078000A6288@nat28.tlf.novell.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:57:07 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad@...nel.org>
Cc: "xen-devel" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen/hypercall: fix hypercall fallback code for
very old hypervisors
>>> On 02.11.12 at 17:44, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
> @@ -359,18 +359,14 @@ HYPERVISOR_update_va_mapping(unsigned long va, pte_t new_val,
> return _hypercall4(int, update_va_mapping, va,
> new_val.pte, new_val.pte >> 32, flags);
> }
> +extern int __must_check xen_HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op_compat(int, void *);
Why don't you drop the HYPERVISOR_ now that you added the xen_?
>...
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_HYPERVISOR_event_channel_op_compat);
While this export is necessary, ...
>...
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xen_HYPERVISOR_physdev_op_compat);
... I would recommend not adding this one without need.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists