linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MODSIGN: Only sign modules if built in-tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87liek4rt5.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:47:10 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Cc:	Bruno Wolff III <bruno@...ff.to>, dhowells@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MODSIGN: Only sign modules if built in-tree

Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com> writes:

> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 07:26:55AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> > I prefer something like this (untested):
>> > 
>> > diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
>> > index 42d0e56..cb66c8d 100644
>> > --- a/Makefile
>> > +++ b/Makefile
>> > @@ -722,8 +722,14 @@ export mod_strip_cmd
>> >  ifeq ($(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG),y)
>> >  MODSECKEY = ./signing_key.priv
>> >  MODPUBKEY = ./signing_key.x509
>> > +ifeq ($(KBUILD_EXTMOD),)
>> > +SIGNFAIL = false
>> > +else
>> > +# External builds might not have a signing key, don't break module_install.
>> > +SIGNFAIL = true
>> > +endif # KBUILD_EXTMOD
>> >  export MODPUBKEY
>> > -mod_sign_cmd = perl $(srctree)/scripts/sign-file $(MODSECKEY) $(MODPUBKEY)
>> > +mod_sign_cmd = perl $(srctree)/scripts/sign-file $(MODSECKEY) $(MODPUBKEY) || $(SIGNFAIL)
>> >  else
>> >  mod_sign_cmd = true
>> >  endif
>> 
>> OK.  I'll give this a spin locally today, but at first glance it seems
>> like it would do the same.
>
> We need to put $(SIGNFAIL) before the perl script invocation or we get
> errors because mod_sign_cmd is passed an argument and sign-file is
> treating the "|| $(SIGNFAIL)" as something it's passed.  That was the
> only change I needed to make and it works as expected.
>
> Do you want me to send a v2 of the patch, or will you add it yourself
> given you've basically written the code?  Either way works for me.

Please re-submit.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/