[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ip9o4rpp.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:49:14 +1030
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MODSIGN: Add modules_sign make target
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 06:03:18PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com> writes:
>>
>> > If CONFIG_MODULE_SIG is set, and 'make modules_sign' is called then this
>> > patch will cause the modules to get a signature appended. The make target
>> > is intended to be run after 'make modules_install', and will modify the
>> > modules in-place in the installed location. It can be used to produce
>> > signed modules after they have been processed by distribution build
>> > scripts.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
>>
>> It's a bit of a niche case, but applied.
>
> Thanks. Whether you consider RPM built kernels niche or not doesn't
> matter to me. Having this upstream is one less patch we have to carry
> so I appreciate it a lot.
My comment was more that this relies on eu-strip, because we always
sign modules on installation, so you need eu-strip to *unsign* them
(strip won't do it, BTW).
More general would be a modules_install_unsigned target to match this,
but since noone would use it, let's not write it :)
Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists