[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121105045735.GA912@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:57:35 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Harvey Yang <harvey.huawei.yang@...il.com>
Cc: Matt Mooney <mfm@...eddisk.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: usbip: remove an unnecessary lock in
usbip_event_happened. The variable "happened" is local. So I think there is
no need to lock here.
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 12:50:26PM +0800, Harvey Yang wrote:
> From: harvey.yang <harvey.huawei.yang@...il.com>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: harvey.yang <harvey.huawei.yang@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/usbip/usbip_event.c | 2 --
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/usbip/usbip_event.c b/drivers/staging/usbip/usbip_event.c
> index d332a34..668f8e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/usbip/usbip_event.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/usbip/usbip_event.c
> @@ -116,10 +116,8 @@ int usbip_event_happened(struct usbip_device *ud)
> {
> int happened = 0;
>
> - spin_lock(&ud->lock);
> if (ud->event != 0)
> happened = 1;
> - spin_unlock(&ud->lock);
>
> return happened;
Are you sure that the real fix for this isn't just making 'happened' a
static variable? That would make more sense here. Well maybe, the code
seems pretty dumb, it's hard to tell what this is supposed to be doing,
any ideas?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists