[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPEGOOKZTxR725UtoeEXDeCaS4RgvBHfymJYzknaopwsoWMh1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 11:04:39 +0530
From: Prashant Shah <kerneldev100@...il.com>
To: Harvey Yang <harvey.huawei.yang@...il.com>
Cc: Matt Mooney <mfm@...eddisk.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] staging: usbip: remove an unnecessary lock in
usbip_event_happened. The variable "happened" is local. So I think there is
no need to lock here.
Hi,
> int happened = 0;
>
> - spin_lock(&ud->lock);
> if (ud->event != 0)
> happened = 1;
> - spin_unlock(&ud->lock);
>
> return happened;
I am guessing locking was intended to protect ud->event along with
happened so that (checking the value of ud->event and setting value of
happened) was atomic.
return ud->event != 0 ? 1 : 0;
Regards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists