[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5839.1352160112@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 00:01:52 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, joeyli <jlee@...e.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Add firmware signature file check
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> this is a patch series to add the support for firmware signature
> check. At this time, the kernel checks extra signature file (*.sig)
> for each firmware, instead of embedded signature.
> It's just a quick hack using the existing module signing mechanism,
> thus provided only as a proof of concept for now.
There is another way to do this. If you look at the patches I proposed to
wrap keys in PE binaries, you'll find that that can handle PKCS#7 format
messages as that's what's in the sort of signed PE binary we're dealing with.
You could use this to put the firmware inside a signed-data PKCS#7 message.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists