linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 103/104] mm: remove depends on CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1211051721030.24937@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Mon, 5 Nov 2012 17:22:35 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 103/104] mm: remove depends on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

On Mon, 5 Nov 2012, Kees Cook wrote:

> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index a3f8ddd..679945e 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
>  config SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
>  	def_bool y
> -	depends on EXPERIMENTAL || ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
>  
>  choice
>  	prompt "Memory model"

I thought you agreed to only drop EXPERIMENTAL here in 
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135103415901094 and leave 
ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL, which you've orphaned with the above, for phase 
two of your effort?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/