linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 103/104] mm: remove depends on CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 5 Nov 2012 17:54:16 -0800
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 103/104] mm: remove depends on CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL

On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:22 PM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2012, Kees Cook wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
>> index a3f8ddd..679945e 100644
>> --- a/mm/Kconfig
>> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,6 +1,5 @@
>>  config SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
>>       def_bool y
>> -     depends on EXPERIMENTAL || ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL
>>
>>  choice
>>       prompt "Memory model"
>
> I thought you agreed to only drop EXPERIMENTAL here in
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=135103415901094 and leave
> ARCH_SELECT_MEMORY_MODEL, which you've orphaned with the above, for phase
> two of your effort?

Ah! Yes, thanks. I'll restore that.

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/