lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 10:30:26 +0800 From: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com> To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, joeyli <jlee@...e.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Add firmware signature file check On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote: > > To be noted, it doesn't support the firmwares via udev but only the > direct loading, and the check for built-in firmware is missing, too. Generally, both direct loading and udev may request one same firmware image. And after check failed, current firmware load will fallback on udev to complete loading, so looks a check-failed firmware still can be loaded into kernel no matter if there is firmware signature check or not. Thanks, -- Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists