[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANN689Gt2mG8xfkVkFtOHDFxkoZZAL-p-8yMSw=qvy5zaGs1ag@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 19:13:19 -0800
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, riel@...hat.com, hughd@...gle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
x86@...nel.org, wli@...omorphy.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] mm: use vm_unmapped_area() on sparc32 architecture
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:25 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 14:47:12 -0800
>
>> Update the sparc32 arch_get_unmapped_area function to make use of
>> vm_unmapped_area() instead of implementing a brute force search.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
>
> Hmmm...
>
>> - if (flags & MAP_SHARED)
>> - addr = COLOUR_ALIGN(addr);
>> - else
>> - addr = PAGE_ALIGN(addr);
>
> What part of vm_unmapped_area() is going to duplicate this special
> aligning logic we need on sparc?
The idea there is that you can specify the desired alignment mask and
offset using info.align_mask and info.align_offset.
Now, I just noticed that the old code actually always uses an
alignment offset of 0 instead of basing it on pgoff. I'm not sure why
that is, but it looks like this may be an issue ?
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists