[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121106031219.GB24235@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 03:12:19 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-efi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Second attempt at kernel secure boot support
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:46:32PM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> writes:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 11:16:12AM -0800, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> writes:
> >> > No, in the general case the system will do that once it fails to find a
> >> > bootable OS on the drive.
> >>
> >> In the general case there will be a bootable OS on the drive.
> >
> > That's in no way a given.
>
> You have it backwards. The conclusion here is that having a case where
> a non-interactive install is possible is not a given.
I deal with customers who perform non-interactive installs. The fact
that you don't care about that use case is entirely irrelevant to me,
because you're not the person that I am obliged to satisfy.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists