[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DE8DF0795D48FD4CA783C40EC829233537BB2F@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 16:52:50 +0000
From: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@...el.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xen.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Xen acpi pad implement
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 12:58:19PM +0000, Liu, Jinsong wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If it is generic ACPI code, than it can depend only on ACPI.
>>>>> If it is ACPI code that contains X86 specific info, than it needs
>>>>> to depend on X86 too.
>>>>
>>>> No x86 specific so let's depend on ACPI.
>>>
>>> Huh? This feature is x86 specific isn't it? I mean it is in the ACPI
>>> spec, but only x86 does it right?
>>
>> OK, updated w/ ACPI & X86 dependency, and per other comments.
>
> Ok. Could you send all the patchset in one go. I am bit lost of which
> one to review as none of them seem to have the version information
> [vX: Did this yyy]
Not quite clear your meaning, do you mean not reply old email and start a new thread with title like
[PATCH vX 1/2]: xen/acpi: ACPI PAD driver
[PATCH vX 2/2]: ...
?
>
> right above your name or in the title:
> [PATCH vX 1/2]: yyyy
>
> anyhow, some comments below.
>
OK.
Thanks,
Jinsong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists