[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121107.144212.1481427869140100342.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:42:12 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
isdn@...ux-pingi.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] isdn: Make CONFIG_ISDN depend on CONFIG_NETDEVICES
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 15:04:36 +0000
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 10:55:03 +0100
> Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
>
>> It doesn't make much sense to enable ISDN services if you don't
>> intend to connect to a network.
>
> I would disagree. However what I don't understand and you've not
> explained is why the current code is a bug or a problem ?
>
> This seems to be a make-work inconvenience causing patch that serves no
> useful purpose ?
The ISDN drivers are peppered with CONFIG_NETDEVICES protection,
but there are missing cases in several locations.
This is ugly, and causes build problems, so adding the dependency
is the cleanest and most correct soluation and I fully intend
to apply this patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists