lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DCD177647606E9419ED923E0C8C4AA7223E7398080@inbmail02.lsi.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 Nov 2012 11:35:51 +0530
From:	"Reddy, Sreekanth" <Sreekanth.Reddy@....com>
To:	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>,
	"linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>
CC:	"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
	"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	"neilb@...e.de" <neilb@...e.de>,
	"vgoyal@...hat.com" <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	"Moore, Eric" <Eric.Moore@....com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>,
	"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 08/24] block: Remove some unnecessary bi_vcnt usage

Hi,

This patch seem to be fine. Please consider this patch as Acked-by: "Sreekanth Reddy" <Sreekanth.reddy@....com>

Regards,
Sreekanth.

-----Original Message-----
From: linux-scsi-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-scsi-owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Kent Overstreet
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:39 AM
To: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; dm-devel@...hat.com
Cc: Kent Overstreet; tj@...nel.org; axboe@...nel.dk; neilb@...e.de; vgoyal@...hat.com; Moore, Eric; James E.J. Bottomley; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/24] block: Remove some unnecessary bi_vcnt usage

More prep work for immutable bvecs/effecient bio splitting - usage of bi_vcnt has to be auditing, so getting rid of all the unnecessary usage makes that easier.

Plus, bio_segments() is really what this code wanted, as it respects the current value of bi_idx.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
CC: Eric Moore <Eric.Moore@....com>
CC: "James E.J. Bottomley" <JBottomley@...allels.com>
CC: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
---
 drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c          |  6 +++---
 drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c       |  6 +++---
 drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_transport.c | 10 +++++-----
 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c index 551262e..5406a9f 100644
--- a/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
+++ b/drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c
@@ -2235,10 +2235,10 @@ static int mptsas_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
 	}
 
 	/* do we need to support multiple segments? */
-	if (req->bio->bi_vcnt > 1 || rsp->bio->bi_vcnt > 1) {
+	if (bio_segments(req->bio) > 1 || bio_segments(rsp->bio) > 1) {
 		printk(MYIOC_s_ERR_FMT "%s: multiple segments req %u %u, rsp %u %u\n",
-		    ioc->name, __func__, req->bio->bi_vcnt, blk_rq_bytes(req),
-		    rsp->bio->bi_vcnt, blk_rq_bytes(rsp));
+		    ioc->name, __func__, bio_segments(req->bio), blk_rq_bytes(req),
+		    bio_segments(rsp->bio), blk_rq_bytes(rsp));
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
index efc6e72..ee331a7 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c
@@ -2151,10 +2151,10 @@ int sas_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
 	}
 
 	/* do we need to support multiple segments? */
-	if (req->bio->bi_vcnt > 1 || rsp->bio->bi_vcnt > 1) {
+	if (bio_segments(req->bio) > 1 || bio_segments(rsp->bio) > 1) {
 		printk("%s: multiple segments req %u %u, rsp %u %u\n",
-		       __func__, req->bio->bi_vcnt, blk_rq_bytes(req),
-		       rsp->bio->bi_vcnt, blk_rq_bytes(rsp));
+		       __func__, bio_segments(req->bio), blk_rq_bytes(req),
+		       bio_segments(rsp->bio), blk_rq_bytes(rsp));
 		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_transport.c b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_transport.c
index c6cf20f..403a57b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_transport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/mpt2sas/mpt2sas_transport.c
@@ -1939,7 +1939,7 @@ _transport_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
 	ioc->transport_cmds.status = MPT2_CMD_PENDING;
 
 	/* Check if the request is split across multiple segments */
-	if (req->bio->bi_vcnt > 1) {
+	if (bio_segments(req->bio) > 1) {
 		u32 offset = 0;
 
 		/* Allocate memory and copy the request */ @@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ _transport_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
 
 	/* Check if the response needs to be populated across
 	 * multiple segments */
-	if (rsp->bio->bi_vcnt > 1) {
+	if (bio_segments(rsp->bio) > 1) {
 		pci_addr_in = pci_alloc_consistent(ioc->pdev, blk_rq_bytes(rsp),
 		    &pci_dma_in);
 		if (!pci_addr_in) {
@@ -2038,7 +2038,7 @@ _transport_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
 	sgl_flags = (MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_SIMPLE_ELEMENT |
 	    MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_END_OF_BUFFER | MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_HOST_TO_IOC);
 	sgl_flags = sgl_flags << MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_SHIFT;
-	if (req->bio->bi_vcnt > 1) {
+	if (bio_segments(req->bio) > 1) {
 		ioc->base_add_sg_single(psge, sgl_flags |
 		    (blk_rq_bytes(req) - 4), pci_dma_out);
 	} else {
@@ -2054,7 +2054,7 @@ _transport_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
 	    MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_LAST_ELEMENT | MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_END_OF_BUFFER |
 	    MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_END_OF_LIST);
 	sgl_flags = sgl_flags << MPI2_SGE_FLAGS_SHIFT;
-	if (rsp->bio->bi_vcnt > 1) {
+	if (bio_segments(rsp->bio) > 1) {
 		ioc->base_add_sg_single(psge, sgl_flags |
 		    (blk_rq_bytes(rsp) + 4), pci_dma_in);
 	} else {
@@ -2099,7 +2099,7 @@ _transport_smp_handler(struct Scsi_Host *shost, struct sas_rphy *rphy,
 		    le16_to_cpu(mpi_reply->ResponseDataLength);
 		/* check if the resp needs to be copied from the allocated
 		 * pci mem */
-		if (rsp->bio->bi_vcnt > 1) {
+		if (bio_segments(rsp->bio) > 1) {
 			u32 offset = 0;
 			u32 bytes_to_copy =
 			    le16_to_cpu(mpi_reply->ResponseDataLength);
--
1.7.12

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ