linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 8/7] pppoatm: fix missing wakeup in pppoatm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1352532973.9449.105.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>
Date:	Sat, 10 Nov 2012 07:36:13 +0000
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	krzysiek@...lesie.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chas@....nrl.navy.mil
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/7] pppoatm: fix missing wakeup in pppoatm_send()

On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 16:30 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> I don't know what to do with this patch because I don't have any
> context whatsoever.

I sent two replies to Krzysztof's series starting with [PATCH v3 0/7]  
in Message-Id: <1352240222-363-1-git-send-email-krzysiek@...lesie.net>

The first was pointing out a problem; the second was a [PATCH v3 8/7]
which fixed the problem I'd pointed out. It wasn't clear to me that more
context would be needed. In particular, [PATCH v3 8/7] was a reply to
0/7, just as the other patches ##1-7 had been.

> So I'm tossing it, please resubmit it when it's meant to be
> applied, and with some context.

That's OK. I was hoping for an ack from Chas and/or Krzysztof,
especially as I hadn't tested my patch. So hopefully there'll be a v4
series of 8 patches, including this one... and all from the same person,
which makes it slightly easier to follow :)

-- 
dwmw2

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/x-pkcs7-signature" (6171 bytes)