[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121109.163012.719663130136182296.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 16:30:12 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: dwmw2@...radead.org
Cc: krzysiek@...lesie.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chas@....nrl.navy.mil
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/7] pppoatm: fix missing wakeup in pppoatm_send()
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 12:52:14 +0000
> Now that we can return zero from pppoatm_send() for reasons *other* than
> the queue being full, that means we can't depend on a subsequent call to
> pppoatm_pop() waking the queue, and we might leave it stalled
> indefinitely.
>
> Fix this by immediately scheduling the wakeup tasklet. As documented
> already elsewhere, the PPP channel's ->downl lock protects against the
> wakeup happening too soon and effectively being missed.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com>
> ----
> Untested.
> With this sorted, Acked-By: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@...el.com<
> to the other seven. Thanks.
I don't know what to do with this patch because I don't have any
context whatsoever.
So I'm tossing it, please resubmit it when it's meant to be
applied, and with some context.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists