[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd_=wCLo5RZhOaur7Yjw+6MYk-DhRPTjy148Yo0z6z9BcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:12:39 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fat: fix time updates for create and delete
2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>:
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> writes:
>
>> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> writes:
>>
>>> 2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>:
>>>> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> writes:
>>>>
>>>>> Correctly update modification and status change time in case of
>>>>> file/directory removal and creation.
>>>>
>>>> This changelog just explain "what", and it doesn't explain "why".
>>>> Please
>>>> explain why we need this change.
>>>>
>>>> IIRC, timestamp handling in FAT driver is strange historically. Anyway,
>>>> FAT doesn't have "inode change time". It is "creation time" in FAT.
>>> Hi. OGAWA.
>>> I made this patch after comparing timestamp handlings with MSDOS and
>>> XFS.
>>> Should timestamp handling of FAT be same with MSDOS ?
>>> Am I missing ?
>>
>> What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS?
Okay, the description of patch was lacked, So I will resend patch with
specifical test reseult with other filesystem.
>
> BTW, I recall I checked this, and yes, it is strange. But it is historical.
"historical" means It is difficult to change ?
Thanks.
> --
> OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists