| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87obj35k3a.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:58:01 +0900 From: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fat: fix time updates for create and delete OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> writes: > Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> writes: > >> 2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>: >>> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> writes: >>> >>>> Correctly update modification and status change time in case of >>>> file/directory removal and creation. >>> >>> This changelog just explain "what", and it doesn't explain "why". Please >>> explain why we need this change. >>> >>> IIRC, timestamp handling in FAT driver is strange historically. Anyway, >>> FAT doesn't have "inode change time". It is "creation time" in FAT. >> Hi. OGAWA. >> I made this patch after comparing timestamp handlings with MSDOS and XFS. >> Should timestamp handling of FAT be same with MSDOS ? >> Am I missing ? > > What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS? BTW, I recall I checked this, and yes, it is strange. But it is historical. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists