linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] fat: fix time updates for create and delete

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87sj8f5k4m.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:57:13 +0900
From:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To:	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fat: fix time updates for create and delete

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> writes:

> 2012/11/12, OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>:
>> Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> writes:
>>
>>> Correctly update modification and status change time in case of
>>> file/directory removal and creation.
>>
>> This changelog just explain "what", and it doesn't explain "why". Please
>> explain why we need this change.
>>
>> IIRC, timestamp handling in FAT driver is strange historically. Anyway,
>> FAT doesn't have "inode change time". It is "creation time" in FAT.
> Hi. OGAWA.
> I made this patch after comparing timestamp handlings with MSDOS and XFS.
> Should timestamp handling of FAT be same with MSDOS ?
> Am I missing ?

What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS?
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/