[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20121113215345.680e1f8e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:53:45 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 14
On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:37:42 -0800 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> It would help if the old sched/numa code wasn't in -next while you're
> away.
Now I think about it, that's going to be hard. If I integrate against
tomorrow's -next, the mmotm patches will be against next+schednuma.
Then you'll need to unintegrate them - effectively redo them against
mainline.
That won't be toooo hard, but there are some tricky bits. Is there a way
I can extract a schednuma-free -next tomorrow? That way I can do the wrangling.
This thing really has been a pain ;( I've been uncharacteristically
patient!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists