[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121114064726.GA2537@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 07:47:26 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 14
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:30:42 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> > News: next-20121115 (i.e. tomorrow) will be the last release until
> > next-20121126 (which should be just be after -rc7, I guess - assuming
> > that Linus does not release v3.7 before then), so if you want something
> > in linux-next for a reasonable amount of testing, it should probably be
> > committed tomorrow.
>
> It would help if the old sched/numa code wasn't in -next while
> you're away. That would give me a clean run at 3.7 and will
> make it easier for others to integrate and test the four(!)
> different autoschednumacore implementations on top of
> linux-next.
>
> Pretty please?
The next integration should have this solved: I have removed the
old sched/numa bits, replaced by the latest rebased/reworked
numa/core bits.
(There's no fundamental changes to the mm/ bits, so the
conflict/merge fall-out should be minimal and/or trivial.)
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists